So I just traded Matt Kemp for Jeremy Hermida. Being the great GM that I am I decided to do some research after I made the deal.
Why did I make the deal, you ask? Because its PB that we play. I made the trade in a 24 team league, thus stats are pretty accurate, but its still going to have a platoon effect. Simply stated I wanted a lefty over a righty.
Did I make the right decision? Using Pecota from Baseball Prospectus shows Kemp and Hermida to very even. I decided to include Hunter Pence here as well as he will be a top 5 pick and is one of the top OF in this draft. Notice in EQA he is the lowest rated player? But look at WARP, he wins hands down. Why? Because he is projected at CF while the other to guys are at RF.
Positional value needs to be included as one set of criteria, along with a players age, hitting skills, team he is with, your needs, etc. If I could have Pence over Hermida I'd probably give up some offense to get CF play, plus I'd take Hermida over Kemp by a whisker. Hope you enjoyed. If you have some spare cash join Baseball Prospectus as its fun to use Pecota and see a players career.
| KEMP | | | | | | | | | | EQUIVALENTS | | | | |
| Year | PA | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | EqA | VORP | Defense | WARP |
| 2007 (age 22) | 311 | 12 | 5 | 10 | 16 | 66 | 10 | 5 | 0.345 | 0.379 | 0.541 | 0.920 | 0.304 | 23.400 | 69-RF -4 | 3.1 |
| 2008 (age 23) | 496 | 28 | 4 | 19 | 35 | 97 | 18 | 5 | 0.294 | 0.347 | 0.511 | 0.858 | 0.287 | 27.700 | 117-RF 0 | 4.200 |
| 2009 (age 24) | 511 | 29 | 4 | 20 | 38 | 98 | 18 | 5 | 0.293 | 0.349 | 0.504 | 0.853 | 0.291 | 26.000 | 120-RF 0 | 4.200 |
| 2010 (age 25) | 527 | 30 | 4 | 22 | 42 | 98 | 18 | 5 | 0.300 | 0.358 | 0.520 | 0.878 | 0.298 | 31.000 | 124-RF 1 | 4.700 |
| 2011 (age 26) | 518 | 30 | 3 | 22 | 43 | 93 | 21 | 5 | 0.301 | 0.361 | 0.524 | 0.885 | 0.301 | 32.400 | 122-RF 0 | 4.700 |
| 2012 (age 27) | 556 | 34 | 3 | 25 | 45 | 97 | 19 | 4 | 0.299 | 0.357 | 0.530 | 0.887 | 0.300 | 28.200 | 131-RF 0 | 4.100 |
| 2013 (age 28) | 541 | 32 | 3 | 24 | 45 | 97 | 15 | 4 | 0.291 | 0.348 | 0.520 | 0.868 | 0.293 | 25.100 | 127-RF -2 | 3.800 |
| 2014 (age 29) | 536 | 30 | 2 | 24 | 47 | 96 | 14 | 3 | 0.288 | 0.349 | 0.512 | 0.861 | 0.292 | 23.100 | 126-RF -2 | 3.600 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 0.876 | 0.296 | | | 32.400 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| HERMIDA | | | | | | | | | | EQUIVALENTS | | | | |
| Year | PA | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | EqA | VORP | Defense | WARP |
| 2007 (age 23) | 484 | 32 | 1 | 18 | 47 | 105 | 3 | 4 | 0.304 | 0.379 | 0.525 | 0.904 | 0.300 | 27.300 | 111-RF 1 | 4.9 |
| 2008 (age 24) | 532 | 31 | 2 | 19 | 67 | 106 | 9 | 3 | 0.284 | 0.377 | 0.494 | 0.871 | 0.295 | 27.900 | 125-RF -1 | 4.500 |
| 2009 (age 25) | 541 | 31 | 2 | 20 | 68 | 104 | 9 | 2 | 0.278 | 0.370 | 0.485 | 0.855 | 0.294 | 24.300 | 127-RF 0 | 4.500 |
| 2010 (age 26) | 566 | 32 | 2 | 21 | 74 | 111 | 10 | 3 | 0.275 | 0.371 | 0.484 | 0.855 | 0.294 | 24.500 | 133-RF -1 | 4.500 |
| 2011 (age 27) | 552 | 31 | 2 | 20 | 73 | 102 | 9 | 2 | 0.280 | 0.376 | 0.487 | 0.863 | 0.297 | 26.000 | 130-RF -4 | 4.400 |
| 2012 (age 28) | 542 | 31 | 2 | 19 | 71 | 99 | 7 | 2 | 0.279 | 0.374 | 0.485 | 0.859 | 0.295 | 23.500 | 127-RF -3 | 4.000 |
| 2013 (age 29) | 494 | 26 | 2 | 18 | 67 | 94 | 7 | 2 | 0.274 | 0.372 | 0.478 | 0.850 | 0.293 | 19.600 | 117-RF -3 | 3.600 |
| 2014 (age 30) | 565 | 32 | 2 | 22 | 76 | 104 | 9 | 2 | 0.281 | 0.376 | 0.498 | 0.874 | 0.299 | 22.800 | 132-RF -5 | 3.600 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 0.866 | 0.296 | | | 34.000 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| PENCE | | | | | | | | | | EQUIVALENTS | | | | |
| Year | PA | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | EqA | VORP | Defense | WARP |
| 2007 (age 24) | 484 | 30 | 9 | 17 | 26 | 95 | 11 | 5 | 0.329 | 0.370 | 0.561 | 0.931 | 0.31 | 40.5 | 93-CF 5 | 6.4 |
| 2008 (age 25) | 567 | 30 | 4 | 23 | 44 | 110 | 13 | 4 | 0.288 | 0.347 | 0.505 | 0.852 | 0.29 | 32 | 133-CF 2 | 5.4 |
| 2009 (age 26) | 589 | 31 | 5 | 25 | 51 | 113 | 13 | 4 | 0.286 | 0.349 | 0.504 | 0.853 | 0.29 | 32 | 138-CF 1 | 5.4 |
| 2010 (age 27) | 600 | 33 | 4 | 26 | 51 | 111 | 13 | 3 | 0.292 | 0.353 | 0.513 | 0.866 | 0.29 | 34 | 140-CF 2 | 5.5 |
| 2011 (age 28) | 587 | 33 | 5 | 25 | 50 | 113 | 11 | 3 | 0.289 | 0.350 | 0.514 | 0.864 | 0.29 | 30.3 | 137-CF -1 | 4.7 |
| 2012 (age 29) | 549 | 29 | 4 | 25 | 50 | 105 | 9 | 3 | 0.290 | 0.355 | 0.518 | 0.873 | 0.3 | 30.4 | 129-CF -3 | 4.6 |
| 2013 (age 30) | 536 | 30 | 3 | 23 | 50 | 103 | 8 | 2 | 0.284 | 0.350 | 0.504 | 0.854 | 0.29 | 24.1 | 126-CF -4 | 3.8 |
| 2014 (age 31) | 534 | 28 | 3 | 24 | 50 | 98 | 7 | 2 | 0.287 | 0.353 | 0.513 | 0.866 | 0.29 | 23.4 | 125-CF -3 | 3.7 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 0.870 | 0.293 | | | 39.5 |